I'm very happy to see that somebody had the guts finally to try and tackle the issue of 11 September. At last the truth behind the bombing of the World Trade Centre may come to light. Unlike the other killjoy who sent you the tasteless mail about the bombing being a hoax, I don't doubt for a second that the attack took place. In my view, however, your correspondent made a serious mistake in an otherwise enlightening exposé in writing:
'On one hand, the White House could well have been chosen as powerful symbolic expression of Canadian superiority, seeing as the Canadians already burned it down once before during the War of 1812.'
Wait a minute. What war of 1812? What was that about the White House being burned down? As far as I know there was no State called Canada in 1812. How could a State that didn't exist at the time invade the US and burn down the White House? I think we should be told. Also, I'd very much appreciate it if somebody could come up with some evidence of this "event". In fact, I'll show a bit more largesse than the average holocoast denier - show me some photos or roll out an eye-witness, and I'll be more than happy!
|Back to: THE MAD REVISIONIST
We do not recruit, we convince
Truth has no need for coercion