The first key discovery was that, after the first jury was able to see through the hoax, the Traditional Enemy immediately attempted to try him again. This was their first mistake. Every revisionist expert knows this is double jeopardy. You cannot try a man twice for the same crime. That is part of our Constitution which, as we all know, the Traditional Enemy is trying undermine. What better way than to besmirch a popular public figure by violating one of the basic guarantees of our freedom. Once this basic truth about the persecution of O.J. Simpson is realized, the traces of the deceit become obvious. The traces of the clumsy conspiracy are easy to spot.
SURPRISE #1: There is no forensic evidence to prove that Nicolle Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman (the Hebraic) are dead. That's right. There is no forensic evidence whatsoever!
The pathologist that supposedly examined the "dead bodies" did not testify at the first trial. That's right. There was never any forensic testimony as to the "autopsies" not a single word. Instead Marcia Clark (and we know what her ancestry was) put on another pathologist who testified for eight days about what another pathologist had done. When the time for the second, illegal trial came around Daniel Petrocelli (most of whose partners, including his mentor, are of Hebrew descent) still could not find a pathologist. He did the same exact thing. He called other pathologists to the witness stand to testify about the "autopsies". All this testimony was hearsay, unacceptable in any real court.
Once we realize that there was no forensic proof that either Nicolle Brown Simpson or Ron Goldman (the Talmudist) were dead, the pattern begins to fall into place. That was the first mistake. But there were others. The big one is the murder weapon.
SURPRISE #2: Nobody ever produced a murder weapon. Is this important? Of course it is. Every Revisionist knows that unless you have a murder weapon you cannot have a murder. The various prosecutors (with their established connections to the Traditional Enemy already established) never produced a murder weapon. By definition they could not prove the physical evidence of a murder.
One reason that their failure to produce a murder weapon is vital towards showing that the murders never took place is that the weapon alleged to have been used makes no sense. O.J. Simpson was a gun collector; he owned no fighting knives. In fact, O.J. Simpson routinely kept a .357 magnum revolver in his car. It is absurd to believe that a gun user would pick up a random knife to attack two people. A gun is much more efficient and was the weapon that O.J. Simpson knew how to use. There is no evidence whatsoever that he knew how to kill someone with a knife. All evidence therefore points to the conclusion that a knife could not have been used to kill Nicolle Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman (the adherent of that tribal cult).
The second absurdity that reveals the knife hoax is that no one ever saw this alleged knife even though they searched his house thoroughly. No one can even describe the knife. All we were ever told is that it was sharp. There is no reason from this to suppose it was a knife. It could have been any sharp instrument. It could have been a hand axe. It could have been a piece of broken glass. It could have been a straight razor. It could have been a piece of Pennsylvania jasper chipped to a fine edge.
It is an indication of the dishonesty of the hoaxers that, even though they cannot produce a knife, they insist that Nicolle Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman (a convinced Zionist) were murdered with one. Some even point to the fact that O.J. Simpson visited a warehouse for Swiss Army knives several days before the alleged murders. The allegations of the hoaxers are ludicrous! Are we expected to believe that O.J. Simpson was fumbling with a Swiss Army knife while he was attacking two people? In this stressful situation of overpowering two people O.J. Simpson somehow is supposed to have found the right blade. Or maybe he just killed them with the fish scaler - Simpson hoaxers will believe just about anything.
The third absurdity is that it is claimed that the "knife" (which does not exist) did things that were physically impossible. As everyone knows knives are designed for certain things. This "knife" had to have had a wide blade for it alleged, but never proven with forensic evidence, that Nicolle Brown Simpson's throat was almost slashed completely through. But when the hoax assailant attacked Ron Goldman (whose mother and father were Jewish) it suddenly turned into an instrument that produced small, deep puncture wounds to his chest. Perhaps the hoaxers want us to believe that he folded the blade he used to attack Nicolle Brown Simpson back into his Swiss Army knife and fumbled with the knife to get out the awl. Simpson hoaxers will make almost any outrageous claim to advance their dishonest theories.
There are other absurdities to the case that the conspirators fabricated against O.J. Simpson. One of the "experts" (who never saw the scene of the crime or the murder weapon) testified that there were TWO people committing the "crime". Apparently - since he did not testify that there were two "knives" - we are supposed to believe that O.J. Simpson and his alleged accomplice passed the "knife" back and forth as they attacked two people.
The icing on the cake, however, is what O.J. Simpson is claimed to have done to himself. According to the legend created by the fabricators (which, as we have shown included several Tribal Members and shabbas goys for the Traditional Enemy), O.J. Simpson supposedly cut himself several times while he was committing the "murders." This preposterous allegation just proves how desperate the fabricators were. O.J. Simpson was a skilled athlete who would not have cut himself when using a "knife." To state otherwise is to fly in the face of reason. If you do not believe this go to your kitchen and take a knife (one that can both produce deep slash wounds and imperceptible puncture wounds if you can find such an instrument) and cut up a chicken or two. See how many times you cut the inside of your fingers. Then tell me how a professional athlete with superior motor skills did what didn't happen to you.
It is this final absurdity which, I think, is the crucial element in explaining the fabrication. The wounds O.J. Simpson received are not those of a person wielding a "knife;" they are the type of wounds a person receives when defending himself against a knife attack. If O.J. Simpson was at the scene of the "crime" - which he denies - the evidence points in another direction. Apparently he found Nicolle Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman (one of The Chosen) together in a compromising position. When he was in a state of shock either Nicolle Brown Simpson or Ron Goldman (an agent of the Sanhedrin) attacked O.J. Simpson with a knife. After he fended off the attack and fled the scene, the pair knew how the public would react to their violent and unjustified attack on an American hero. To protect themselves they fabricated the entire "murder" scenario.
I am sure that you will agree that Nicolle Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman (connected by race to several conspiracies) are still alive and chortling over the manner in which they pulled the wool over the eyes of the public. The Revisionist methodology applied to this case proves this beyond a reasonable doubt. The horror is that this conspiracy was perpetrated against one of the most popular and respected figures of our time. If the Traditional Enemy did it to him, they can do it to you.
THE MAD REVISIONIST:
We do not recruit; we convince. Truth has no need of coercion. We invite
your support and submissions.
|DISCLAIMER: All editorial content on this website is strictly not the writerís/authorís opinion. THE MAD REVISIONIST, located on the moon, is owned and operated by accident. The content of this page is the copyrighted property of THE MAD REVISIONIST. Any illegal copying or circulating of this page, in whole or in part, without the expressed permission of THE MAD REVISIONIST will be taken as a compliment.|