THE MAD REVISIONIST wrote:
> >Just because you have a few witnesses who claim that they saw the
> >sink say that they saw people on board fall into the water, does not mean
> >that they actually WITNESSED anyone in the physical act of drowning. With no
> >witnesses, we have no proof that ANYONE was killed as a result of the Titanic
> >insurance hoax.
> So where did all those bodies come from?
THE MAD REVISIONIST replies:
Ah, but how many bodies were actually found?
According to the official Titanic dogma, 1500 went down with the ship. But this does not match the actual physical evidence that was recovered from the scene.
How many bodies were actually found? Well, I don't know. But I can guarantee you that it was only a fraction of the 1500 number touted by the establishment propagandists.
Yet the media establishment continues to repeat the fraudulent 1500 number ad nauseum. How do they come to the conclusion that the number killed was 1500? You are in for a shock, dear reader, at the shoddiness of their methodology. They simply counted the number of people alleged to have been on the boat, and SUBTRACTED THE NUMBER OF SURVIVORS!
The flaw in this logic should be apparent. The mere fact that a number of people are unaccounted for does not automatically prove that they drowned when their ship hit an iceberg. Dozens of children go missing every year; does the fact that their faces appear on milk cartons automatically lead you to assume that they drowned when their ship hit an iceberg? Yet that is the line that the Titanic propagandists expect you to swallow. This despite the fact that they don't have a SINGLE WITNESS who actually saw someone in the physical act of drowning.
Back to: THE MAD REVISIONIST
We do not recruit, we convince
Truth has no need for coercion