examination of typical
In tribute to the inimitable methodology of revisionist scholar
The Titanic establishment often cites eyewitness testimonies as proof
of their version of the Titanic story. However, careful revisionist
examination of these testimonies has shown them to be largely composed
of irresponsible fabrications. In fact, these documents support the
revisionist perspective that the sinking of the Titanic is really an elaborate
insurance hoax. When one reads the documents generated by so-called
"Titanic survivors", one is struck by the obvious fact that these people
were really concerned only with money and compensation for goods allegedly
lost in this supposed disaster. Yet, despite these demands, and their
libelous implications, they do not offer so much as ONE SHRED of forensic
evidence to back up their claim that the ship hit an iceberg.
Let us take a close look at a document
submitted by one Vincenzo Vicario, of Providence, Rhode Island who made
the following claim against the Steamship "Titanic":
Claimant was the owner of the following property of the kind and
value hereinafter specified, which was aboard the Steamship "Titanic" when
she was sunk as a result of a collision with an iceberg,
Not ONE shred of proof, mind you, simply Vicario’s “word” for it.
What kind of a fool would simply accept such a heinous accusation without
any forensic evidence whatsoever?
in or about latitude 41.46 North, longitude 50.14 West,
Notice that there is no mention of anyone going out to that location to
confirm the story, in spite of the specific co-ordinates offered.
on or about the 14th day of April, 1912,
Why "about" the 14th day of April, 1912? Why not simply "on" the
14th day of April, 1912? Is he so unsure about even the simple matter
of the day on which the boat sank?
UNBELIEVABLE! Why would anyone be concerned with CHEESE, when over
1500 lives had allegedly been lost! The Titanic hoaxers were obviously
overconfident in their determination to milk every possible cent out of
On April 14, 1912, said Steamship "Titanic", with all of the cargo
herinbefore specified on board, was sunk as the result of a collision with
an iceberg at the place aforementioned,
Again, not a single piece of forensic evidence to substantiate the claim.
Doesn't look so good for Vicario about now.
and as a result of the collision the said Steamship "Titanic",
with all her cargo, including that hereinbefore specified, became a total
Home Box Office should have saved this
tale for their “Tales from the Crypt” program! Preposterous nonsense.
Said collision was caused and contributed to by the fault and negligence
of Steamship "Titanic",
Anything that can be used to discredit and defame those that built and
manned the Titanic is accepted without so much as a whisper of protest.
However, one is not permitted to address the inconsistencies and fabrications
of “Titanic survivors”, or they are faced with name-calling and ridicule.
The hypocrisy of these Titanic Terrorists knows no bounds.
by reason of which your claimant as owner of the aforesaid cargo
has sustained damage amounting to the sum of $800, for which he now makes
claim against the Steamship "Titanic".
Again, this overwhelming concern with money. And it should be further
noted that there is no evidence in this document that Vicario was even
ON the Titanic along with his precious cheese. This whole testimony
is based on nothing more than rumor and innuendo, as most Titantic testimony
has proven to be once subjected to thorough examination by revisionists
It is clear that in assessing the witness's credibility, we must conclude
that this Vicario has none. His story has every appearance of being
fabricated, and the motives for the fraud are obvious. It is not
revisionists who seek to dishonestly USE obviously fabricated testimony.
That hypocritical honor is reserved for Titanic Terrorists.
Back to: THE MAD REVISIONIST
We do not recruit, we convince
Truth has no need for coercion